RYAN/TUNED
Got questions?!? Get the answers ->>> http://www.dakotart.com/forum/showth...estions-thread
For fastest response please text or email at ryan@frptuning.com ,please no PM's!!!
96 ram 1500 indy 500 - 410" frp tuned
RYAN/TUNED
Got questions?!? Get the answers ->>> http://www.dakotart.com/forum/showth...estions-thread
For fastest response please text or email at ryan@frptuning.com ,please no PM's!!!
Torque number just seems a bit odd, Just wanted to see the graph. But if you don't wanna post it here for some reason that is fine.
Chris, if you didn't stalk me on every vehicle I post trying to either troll me or accuse me of fudging the numbers , I might be willing to go thru the extra trouble of saving it to my Photo bucket, or even extending the courtesy of linking you to my social media feeds, but to put it bluntly I think you're a jackass. So, pardon my momentary lapse in professionalism, but I'd rather tell you to kick rocks than to be inconvenienced by you.
My belief is that even if you take converter flash out of the equation, it would still be north of 700 wtq. I had a stock converter 360 with a similiar setup make 525/644 and 525/625 on back to back pulls.
RYAN/TUNED
Got questions?!? Get the answers ->>> http://www.dakotart.com/forum/showth...estions-thread
For fastest response please text or email at ryan@frptuning.com ,please no PM's!!!
I didn't need further excuses little buddy.
Et doesn't lie. Does he plan on running the truck in the 1/4 mile?
Last edited by krs1r/t; 09-26-2016 at 01:44 AM. Reason: you know why
Oshenic, you're the one who can't seem to figure out the internet. Maybe if you paid less attention to what I'm doing, and more attention to your own vehicle, you wouldn't be slower than your personal best.
Really, we made multiple pulls, and this is consistent with other blower trucks I do. I've done more than enough to satisfy yet another bullshit witch hunt from you.
I could understand why you'd be upset, if I spent your money to only be sub 500 whp I'd be looking for a scapegoat too, LMAO.
RYAN/TUNED
Got questions?!? Get the answers ->>> http://www.dakotart.com/forum/showth...estions-thread
For fastest response please text or email at ryan@frptuning.com ,please no PM's!!!
Wait, I'm confused. Chris is saying 'show me the graph. I wanna see the graph'. Yet he's talking about it like he's already seen it? We've all seen it. Quit stirring shit already. It makes you look childish.
--Tom
**Photobucket can suck my nut**
I'm a douchebag
Yet you've already seen it because it's not posted here and you're asking questions about peaks in the curve
--Tom
**Photobucket can suck my nut**
I'm a douchebag
RYAN/TUNED
Got questions?!? Get the answers ->>> http://www.dakotart.com/forum/showth...estions-thread
For fastest response please text or email at ryan@frptuning.com ,please no PM's!!!
It's not a time issue, I just can't be bothered with it.
The feeling is mutual when I look at your track times getting slower as you drop more money.
You're going the wrong damn way!
No time for social media, maybe that's your problem and not mine? The bulk of my business is there, not the drtc.
RYAN/TUNED
Got questions?!? Get the answers ->>> http://www.dakotart.com/forum/showth...estions-thread
For fastest response please text or email at ryan@frptuning.com ,please no PM's!!!
Track times didn't get slower, well maybe .04 slower. I switched transmissions and made a few changes to the motor and basically stayed the same. The changes to the motor and trans only netted me like 40 whp. I did expect more out of the changes but I broke a lifter and whipped out the cam. Oh well such is life.
Maybe the new 429ci motor will pick me up a tenth or 2
One of these days I'm gonna build a boosted motor and stop screwing around with n/a stuff.
I think you are all slow, CHECK!
This signature has been deleted thanks to photobucket!
Are you guys actually arguing about a BLOWN 408 that makes 517 RWHP at 10 psi? I think you all need to go back to the drawing board. Someone left their HP somewhere.
1999 Dakota LS-swap. Fastest NA 5.9/6.0 full-weight CC. 12.76 at 109.9.
2000 Durango ZL1 AWD.
When your right your right! From where your sitting we are all slow!
Well that was the point I was heading towards, I made 477 whp on a 408 without the blower.
But he doesn't wanna post the graph here, I just wanted to see if there was a spike or a blip that gives an inaccurate torque value.
I don't know who Ryan likes better me or you. Lol
He keeps talking about money that I have spent. Maybe someone has money issues? Which brought me to my next thought. Where is flying Ryan's race car or truck?
Ah well, this will all be deleted soon.
Two words. Cam. Timing. Scott I figured since you are the end all be all with LSx , that you could have figured that on your own.
The truck weighs right around 5000 lbs, and in getting a cam from Bullet, it was emphasized that it was going to be a street truck. We were concerned about rod strength and rod bolts since supercharging was never part of the original plan, so we didn't want something that made power at 7k either. The end result is what we've come up with so far. Again, this was just to validate what we have done so far, the truck will be on the rollers again later this fall as I have several vehicles to dyno in person in that area.
Rich and I have discussed retarding the cam , but he is inclined to leave it alone. We all want more power but he is thrilled with the end result. He built the truck for himself, not for you two.
Chris, I have no such money issues, LOL I am taking delivery on a 2016 Scat Pack and buying a dyno. I'm not loaded but I work hard for the things I have.
I love the track but with being out of town 15-18 days a month and a steady supply of work both locally and over email, I'd rather invest my time and energy into growing my business than trying to prove something at the track.
Maybe as time goes on ill be able to put aside more free time that would lend itself towards building a car for the track, but right now I have other things that take higher priority.
I expect a lack of civility from Scott but as for you Chris, maybe if you changed your approach from baiting to inquiring, you'd end up with a slightly different reaction out of me.
I know at the end of the day you actually don't give a shit about what this truck makes , it's yet another case of trying to find some level of incompetence on my end. I am not perfect, but with every project I take on I strive to do better and to learn more in the process.
Last edited by FlyinRyan; 09-26-2016 at 11:22 AM.
RYAN/TUNED
Got questions?!? Get the answers ->>> http://www.dakotart.com/forum/showth...estions-thread
For fastest response please text or email at ryan@frptuning.com ,please no PM's!!!
Without any details of the engine, my guess is that the heads flow poorly because of the very high alleged tq with out-of-proportion hp numbers. I really doubt it's a cam timing issue that is causing this much HP loss.
Edit: So basically, you came on here with a teaser to draw people to your facebook page, while acting like this website just isn't good enough for your time. Message, "I'm so cool, you will seek me out in my world". Classy.
Edit 2: Here. I added a picture of what is happening in your intake runner.
Last edited by casias; 09-26-2016 at 12:07 PM.
1999 Dakota LS-swap. Fastest NA 5.9/6.0 full-weight CC. 12.76 at 109.9.
2000 Durango ZL1 AWD.
The heads supposedly flow 290cfm on the intake side. . I agree that the HP is low for the tq, I don't have datalogs for the pulls so until I'm there with the truck I can't comment on if there are other outside variables that could be playing into the numbers.
I mention it on here because it is relevant. I re-direct people to my social media outlets because 1) I pay a hell of a lot more for them and 2) unlike here, my content there gets posted on a every-other-day basis. I'd be an idiot to NOT send them there.
RYAN/TUNED
Got questions?!? Get the answers ->>> http://www.dakotart.com/forum/showth...estions-thread
For fastest response please text or email at ryan@frptuning.com ,please no PM's!!!